Force-Velocity, Impulse-Momentum Relationships: Implications for Efficacy of Purposefully Slow Resistance Training
Brian K. Schilling1,, Michael J. Falvo2, Loren Z.F. Chiu3
Author Information
1 Exercise Neuromechanics Laboratory, The University of Memphis, Memphis, USA
2 Locomotor Control Laboratory, Washington University School of Medicine, USA
3 Department of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, USA
Brian K. Schilling ✉ Director, Exercise Neuromechanics Laboratory, 171 Roane Fieldhouse, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA Email: bschllng@memphis.edu
Publish Date
Received: 07-02-2008 Accepted: 28-04-2008 Published (online): 01-06-2008
Brian K. Schilling, Michael J. Falvo, Loren Z.F. Chiu. (2008) Force-Velocity, Impulse-Momentum Relationships: Implications for Efficacy of Purposefully Slow Resistance Training. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine(07), 299 - 304.
Brian K. Schilling, Michael J. Falvo, Loren Z.F. Chiu. (2008) Force-Velocity, Impulse-Momentum Relationships: Implications for Efficacy of Purposefully Slow Resistance Training. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine(07), 299 - 304.
The purpose of this brief review is to explain the mechanical relationship between impulse and momentum when resistance exercise is performed in a purposefully slow manner (PS). PS is recognized by ~10s concentric and ~4-10s eccentric actions. While several papers have reviewed the effects of PS, none has yet explained such resistance training in the context of the impulse-momentum relationship. A case study of normal versus PS back squats was also performed. An 85kg man performed both normal speed (3 sec eccentric action and maximal acceleration concentric action) and PS back squats over a several loads. Normal speed back squats produced both greater peak and mean propulsive forces than PS action when measured across all loads. However, TUT was greatly increased in the PS condition, with values fourfold greater than maximal acceleration repetitions. The data and explanation herein point to superior forces produced by the neuromuscular system via traditional speed training indicating a superior modality for inducing neuromuscular adaptation.
As velocity approaches zero, propulsive force approaches zero, therefore slow moving objects only require force approximately equal to the weight of the resistance.
As mass is constant during resistance training, a greater impulse will result in a greater velocity.
The inferior propulsive forces accompanying purposefully slow training suggest other methods of resistance training have a greater potential for adaptation.
It is forbidden the total or partial reproduction of this web site
and the published materials, the treatment of its database, any kind
of transition and for any means, either electronic, mechanic or other
methods, without the previous written permission of the JSSM.